Integral field spectroscopy with SINFONI of VVDS galaxies I. Galaxy dynamics and mass assembly at 1.2 < z < 1.6

By B. Epinat, Thierry Contini, O. Fèvre, D. Vergani, Bianca Garilli, P. Amram, J. Queyrel, L. Tasca, L. Tresse. 2009

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Context. Identifying the main processes of galaxy assembly at high redshifts is still a major issue in understanding galaxy formation and evolution at early epochs in the history of the Universe. Aims. This work aims to provide a first insight into the dynamics and mass assembly of galaxies at redshifts $1.2 Methods. We use the near-infrared integral field spectrograph SINFONI on the ESO-VLT under 0.65´´ seeing to obtain spatially resolved spectroscopy on nine emission line galaxies with $1.2 \leq z \leq 1.6$ from the VIMOS VLT Deep Survey. We derive the velocity fields and velocity dispersions on kpc scales using the H α emission line. Results. Out of the nine star-forming galaxies, we find that galaxies are distributed in three groups: two galaxies can be well reproduced by a rotating disk, three systems can be classified as major mergers and four galaxies show disturbed dynamics and high velocity dispersion. We argue that there is evidence for hierarchical mass assembly from major merging, with most massive galaxies with $M>10^{11}~{M_\odot}$ subject to at least one major merger over a 3 Gyr period as well as for continuous accretion feeding strong star formation. Conclusions. These results point towards a galaxy formation and assembly scenario which involves several processes, possibly acting in parallel, with major mergers and continuous gas accretion playing a major role. Well controlled samples representative of the bulk of the galaxy population at this key cosmic time are necessary to make further progress.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b76890edf0e01f01b3fad9c9a1620ba5e6aa16c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Instrumentation

Citations in the corpus

Inferences on the timeline of reionization at z ∼ 8 from the KMOS Lens-Amplified Spectroscopic Survey (2019, background): “…observations have provided revolutionary 3D information about the structure and kinematics of galaxies out to z ∼ 2 (Förster Schreiber et al. 2009; Epinat et al. 2009; Wisnioski et al. 2015; Stott et al. 2016; Genzel et al. 2017) and revealed diffuse Lyα halos around z∼< 6 galaxies (Bacon et…”
A unified model for galactic discs: star formation, turbulence driving, and mass transport (2017, background): “Epinat et al. (2009).”
HYDRODYNAMICS OF HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXY COLLISIONS: FROM GAS-RICH DISKS TO DISPERSION-DOMINATED MERGERS AND COMPACT SPHEROIDS (2010, background): “Substantial samples of Adaptive Optics spectroscopic data really exist only for disk galaxies (e.g., Genzel et al. 2011).”
DUST OBSCURATION AND METALLICITY AT HIGH REDSHIFT: NEW INFERENCES FROM UV, Hα, AND 8 μm OBSERVATIONS OF z ∼ 2 STAR-FORMING GALAXIES (2010, background): “It is possible that the nebular reddening may on average be larger for galaxies that are forming stars at a higher rate and/or hosting an older (less attenuated) stellar population (e.g., Epinat et al. 2009).”
The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey final data release: a spectroscopic sample of 35 016 galaxies and AGN out to z ~ 6.7 selected with 17.5 ≤ iAB ≤ 24.75 (2013, unknown): “…of integral field spectroscopy studies of high-redshift galaxies at z ∼> 1 using the Hα line redshifted into the infrared (e.g. Forster-Schreiber et al. 2009; Epinat et al. 2009; Law et al. 2009; Contini et al. 2012) fully depends on the quality of the parent spectroscopic redshift survey.”
THE IMPACT OF COLD GAS ACCRETION ABOVE A MASS FLOOR ON GALAXY SCALING RELATIONS (2009, background): “The TF relation appears to be already in place at high-redshifts z ≥ 1 (Kassin et al. 2007; Puech et al. 2008; Epinat et al. 2009; Cresci et al. 2009) and has evolved by a factor of 2.5 at a given mass (Cresci et al. 2009) from z ≃ 2.2 to the present.”
PHIBSS: MOLECULAR GAS CONTENT AND SCALING RELATIONS IN z ∼ 1–3 MASSIVE, MAIN-SEQUENCE STAR-FORMING GALAXIES (2012, background): “…of rotational motion to velocity dispersion is typically ~5 (for the same stellar mass range as for the sample in this paper, logM*~10.4…11.5; Genzel et al. 2008, 2011, Förster Schreiber et al.2009, in prep., Law et al. 2009, Epinat et al. 2009, 2012, Wisnioski et al. 2011, 2012, Law et al. 2012b).”
EVIDENCE FOR WIDE-SPREAD ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS-DRIVEN OUTFLOWS IN THE MOST MASSIVE z ∼ 1–2 STAR-FORMING GALAXIES (2014, background): “…growing evidence that a majority of massive z ∼ 1–2.5 SFGs are disks based on kinematic and morphological properties (see also, e.g., Shapiro et al. 2008; Genzel et al. 2008, 2014a; Förster Schreiber et al. 2009; Épinat et al. 2009, 2012; Jones et al. 2010; Wuyts et al. 2011b; Lang et al. 2014).”
Evidence for strong dynamical evolution in disc galaxies through the last 11 Gyr. GHASP VIII – a local reference sample of rotating disc galaxies for high‐redshift studies (2009, methodology): “Similar programs are under progress also using SINFONI at redshift ∼ 1.5 (Epinat et al. 2009b, Queyrel et al. 2009, Contini et al. in preparation) and using OSIRIS at Keck Observatory at redshift ∼ 1.5 (Wright et al. 2007, 2009) and z ∼ 3 (Law et al. 2007, 2009).”
CONSTRAINTS ON THE ASSEMBLY AND DYNAMICS OF GALAXIES. I. DETAILED REST-FRAME OPTICAL MORPHOLOGIES ON KILOPARSEC SCALE OF z ∼ 2 STAR-FORMING GALAXIES (2010, background): “…maps (e.g., Krajnovíc et al. 2006; Flores et al. 2006; Shapiro et al. 2008; Épinat et al. 2010), and to determine the main source of dynamical support from the ratio of rotation velocity to local intrinsic velocity dispersion (e.g. Puech et al. 2007; Cresci et al. 2009; Épinat et al. 2009).”
3D BAROLO: a new 3D algorithm to derive rotation curves of galaxies (2015, background): “Overall, the kinematics is the starting point to investigate several properties of disc galaxies, including but not limited to the dynamics, the matter distribution and the evolution of scaling relations (e.g. Epinat et al. 2009; Miller et al. 2012).”
THE KMOS3D SURVEY: DESIGN, FIRST RESULTS, AND THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY KINEMATICS FROM 0.7 ⩽ z ⩽ 2.7 (2014, background): “…among MS star-forming galaxies (SFGs) out to z ∼ 2.5 (e.g., Förster Schreiber et al. 2006, 2009; Genzel et al. 2006, 2008; Shapiro et al. 2008; Epinat et al. 2009, 2012; Wuyts et al. 2011a) and the evolution of molecular gas mass fractions (e.g. Tacconi et al. 2010, 2013; Daddi et al.…”
Ionization state of inter-stellar medium in galaxies: evolution, SFR-M * -Z dependence, and ionizing photon escape (2013, background): “Moreover, we add 26 lowmass galaxies recently reported by Henry et al. (2013), and four strongly lensed galaxies (Christensen et al. 2012a; Queyrel et al. 2009) to the sample.”
Ionized gas outflows and global kinematics of low-z luminous star-forming galaxies (2014, background): “One important discovery has been that high-z SFGs are dynamically hot systems with very large velocity dispersion (σ ∼ 60-90 kms−1; e.g., Forster-Schreiber et al. 2009) as compared with the general population of disc galaxies in the low-z universe (σ ∼ 20-30 kms−1; e.g., Epinat et al. 2009).”
CONSTRAINTS ON THE ASSEMBLY AND DYNAMICS OF GALAXIES. II. PROPERTIES OF KILOPARSEC-SCALE CLUMPS IN REST-FRAME OPTICAL EMISSION OF z ∼ 2 STAR-FORMING GALAXIES (2011, background): “High-redshift disks are found to have high gas to total baryonic mass fractions of ∼ 20%− 80% and high local intrinsic gas velocity dispersions of∼ 20 − 90 kms−1 (e.g., Erb et al. 2006; Förster Schreiber et al. 2006, 2009; Genzel et al. 2008; Cresci et al. 2009; Épinat et al. 2009; Law et al. 2009; ”
THE SINS SURVEY OF z ∼ 2 GALAXY KINEMATICS: PROPERTIES OF THE GIANT STAR-FORMING CLUMPS (2010, background): “These include the best z ∼ 1.5–2.5 disks from the SINS survey (Cresci et al. 2009; Förster Schreiber et al. 2009), and other recent surveys of z ∼ 1–2.5 SFGs (Wright et al. 2007; van Starkenburg et al. 2008; Epinat et al. 2009; LemoineBusserolle & Lamareille 2010), mainly sampling fairly massive (M”
THE EPOCH OF DISK SETTLING: z ∼ 1 TO NOW (2012, methodology): “For this galaxy we adopt Vrot from Epinat et al. (2009) since their model does not extrapolate significantly beyond the observed velocity field.”
The SINS/zC-SINF Survey of z ∼ 2 Galaxy Kinematics: SINFONI Adaptive Optics–assisted Data and Kiloparsec-scale Emission-line Properties (2018, unknown): “…(e.g., Förster Schreiber et al. 2006, 2009; Genzel et al. 2006, 2008; Shapiro et al. 2008; Cresci et al. 2009; Law et al. 2009; Wright et al. 2009; Épinat et al. 2009, 2012; Jones et al. 2010b; Mancini et al. 2011; Gnerucci et al. 2011a,b; Wisnioski et al. 2011, 2012, 2015; Swinbank…”