A unified model for galactic discs: star formation, turbulence driving, and mass transport

By Mark R. Krumholz, B. Burkhart, John C. Forbes, R. Crocker. 2017

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We introduce a new model for the structure and evolution of the gas in galactic discs. In the model the gas is in vertical pressure and energy balance. Star formation feedback injects energy and momentum, and non-axisymmetric torques prevent the gas from becoming more than marginally gravitationally unstable. From these assumptions we derive the relationship between galaxies' bulk properties (gas surface density, stellar content, and rotation curve) and their star formation rates, gas velocity dispersions, and rates of radial inflow. We show that the turbulence in discs can be powered primarily by star formation feedback, radial transport, or a combination of the two. In contrast to models that omit either radial transport or star formation feedback, the predictions of this model yield excellent agreement with a wide range of observations, including the star formation law measured in both spatially resolved and unresolved data, the correlation between galaxies' star formation rates and velocity dispersions, and observed rates of radial inflow. The agreement holds across a wide range of galaxy mass and type, from local dwarfs to extreme starbursts to high-redshifts discs. We apply the model to galaxies on the star-forming main sequence, and show that it predicts a transition from mostly gravity-driven turbulence at high redshift to star formation-driven turbulence at low redshift. This transition, and the changes in mass transport rates that it produces, naturally explain why galaxy bulges tend to form at high redshift and discs at lower redshift, and why galaxies tend to quench inside-out.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60a85f10476bd345b635542cb6626085c82f1750

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. A. Leroy
  2. Mark R. Krumholz
  3. S. Glover
  4. D. Kruijssen
  5. S. Longmore
  6. A. Schruba
  7. A. Usero
  8. E. Schinnerer

In Computational Mechanics

  1. D. Kruijssen
  2. Janice C. Lee
  3. Erik Rosolowsky
  4. B. Groves
  5. S. Glover

Citations in the corpus