Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli
By G. Butland, J. M. Peregrín-Alvarez, Joyce Li, W.-L. Yang, Xiaochun Yang, Veronica Canadien, A. Starostine, D. Richards, B. Beattie, Nevan J. Krogan and 4 more. Nature, 2005
1,189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Pharmacology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b74eb1b46df6e1ba11c865f80e1b8882a7abf097
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Trey Ideker
- Nevan J. Krogan
- Haiyuan Yu
- A. Shilatifard
- Anna R. Panchenko
- Benjamin A. Shoemaker
- Mark D. Robinson
- Mark Gerstein
In Pharmacology
Citations in the corpus
- Modeling homophily and stochastic equivalence in symmetric relational data (2007, methodology): “5 Protein-protein interaction data Our last example is the protein-protein interaction data of Butland et al. [2005], in which yi,j = 1 if proteins i and j bind and yi,j = 0 otherwise.”
- Phenotypic Landscape of a Bacterial Cell (2010, neutral): “, 2006); essential gene hypomorphs (C-terminally tandem-affinity tagged [Butland et al., 2005] or specific alleles); and a small RNA/small protein knockout library (Hobbs et al.”
- The binary protein-protein interaction landscape of Escherichia coli (2014, neutral): “Comparison of the binary interactome to complexes found through AP-MS and in the EcoCyc database (Supplementary Tables 9 and 10) suggests that the majority of PPIs (2,128) are not between members of complexes.”
- Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2006, methodology): “Previous studies have shown that highly connected proteins within a network tend to be more highly conserved 17,34 , a consequence of either functional constraints or preferential interaction of new proteins with existing highly connected proteins 28 .”
- How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? (2006, neutral): “This assay excels at identifying in vivo protein complexes in yeast and other systems [18], particularly when used with tandem affinity purification (TAP) [19] and genomic knock-in of tags [16] rather than overexpression of transgenes.”
- Differential network biology (2012, methodology): “…identification of pairwise protein interactions (Stelzl et al , 2005; Tarassov et al , 2008; Yu et al , 2008; Consortium, 2011) or protein complexes (Butland et al , 2005; Gavin et al , 2006; Krogan et al , 2006; Sowa et al , 2009) has been a widely used strategy for understanding the physical…”