Social Dominance Orientation and Intergroup Bias: The Legitimation of Favoritism for High-Status Groups
By Shana Levin, Christopher M. Federico, J. Sidanius, J. Rabinowitz. 2002
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b745981a46e46cad21743fbcb9668899484d24f8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Tom Tyler
- R. Lalonde
- Winnifred R. Louis
- Andrew N. Christopher
- D. Terry
- Melinda S. Mull
- D. van Knippenberg
- David de Cremer
In Sociology and Political Science
- Andrew N. Christopher
- Winnifred R. Louis
- Tom Tyler
- R. Lalonde
- D. Terry
- Melinda S. Mull
- David de Cremer
- Thomas Bauwens
Citations in the corpus
- Conservative Ideology and Ambivalent Sexism (2006, background): “Levin et al. (2002) found that SDO was positively related to bias in favor of high-status groups when one was a member of such a group.”
- Why do citizens want to keep refugees out? Threats, fairness and hostile norms in the treatment of asylum seekers (2007, background): “Consistent with past research linking social dominance orientation to hostility towards low power minorities (e.g. Levin et al., 2002; Sidanius, 1993), it was observed that those who embraced hierarchical rather than egalitarian social structures were disproportionately likely, one month later, to…”
- Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. (2006, background): “And Levin et al. (2002) show that among low-status group members, ideologies justifying inequality are linked to favoring the high-status group only when status differences are viewed as legitimate.”