The ConsensusPathDB interaction database: 2013 update

By Atanas Kamburov, Ulrich Stelzl, Hans Lehrach, Ralf Herwig. Nucleic Acids Res., 2012

784 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Knowledge of the various interactions between molecules in the cell is crucial for understanding cellular processes in health and disease. Currently available interaction databases, being largely complementary to each other, must be integrated to obtain a comprehensive global map of the different types of interactions. We have previously reported the development of an integrative interaction database called ConsensusPathDB (http://ConsensusPathDB.org) that aims to fulfill this task. In this update article, we report its significant progress in terms of interaction content and web interface tools. ConsensusPathDB has grown mainly due to the integration of 12 further databases; it now contains 215 541 unique interactions and 4601 pathways from overall 30 databases. Binary protein interactions are scored with our confidence assessment tool, IntScore. The ConsensusPathDB web interface allows users to take advantage of these integrated interaction and pathway data in different contexts. Recent developments include pathway analysis of metabolite lists, visualization of functional gene/metabolite sets as overlap graphs, gene set analysis based on protein complexes and induced network modules analysis that connects a list of genes through various interaction types. To facilitate the interactive, visual interpretation of interaction and pathway data, we have re-implemented the graph visualization feature of ConsensusPathDB using the Cytoscape.js library.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7340682cd94e4a40df2823cee68ff166be93f86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Peer Bork
  2. Lars Juhl Jensen
  3. C. von Mering
  4. Damian Szklarczyk
  5. Sampo Pyysalo
  6. Igor Jurisica
  7. Nicolas Le Novère
  8. Daniele Raimondi

In Molecular Biology

  1. Peer Bork
  2. Lars Juhl Jensen
  3. C. von Mering
  4. Damian Szklarczyk
  5. Igor Jurisica
  6. Martina Kutmon
  7. Nadezhda T. Doncheva
  8. Chris T. A. Evelo

Citations in the corpus