Implementing Environmental Policies in Developing Countries Through Decentralization: The Case of Protected Areas in Bahia, Brazil
By Jose A. Puppim de Oliveira. 2002
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b709ff51cc7467b9ff50105491a74624e8e6b4ab
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
- K. Andersson
- Elinor Ostrom
- Jose A. Puppim de Oliveira
- Stefan Partelow
- Carl Folke
- E. Araral
- Harini Nagendra
- Manuel González de Molina
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Governmental responses to tourism development: three Brazilian case studies (2003, background): “When investments are planned in a certain economic sector, policymakers can allocate part of these investments to environmental measures (Puppim de Oliveira, 2002).”
- Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective (2008, background): “One of the core findings of the extant literature on decentralized natural resource governance is that effective decentralized governance requires that local governments possess sufficient internal institutional capacity to be able to operate adequately (Ellis and Mdoe 2003; Fiszbein 1997; Gow and M”
- Who talks with whom? The role of repeated interactions in decentralized forest governance (2004, background): “1 One of the most common empirical findings in the recent decentralization literature is that the effectiveness of local governments in the natural resource sectors depends on the degree to which local governments involve local resource users in political decision making and are downwardly accountab”
- Decentralization's Effects on Educational Outcomes in Bolivia and Colombia (2008, unknown): “Fiszbein (1997), Shankar and Shah (2003), de Oliveira (2002), and Parry (1997) are among the most enthusiastic, finding that decentralization can spur capacity building in local government (Colombia), decrease levels of regional inequality through political competition (a sample of 26 countries),…”
- Understanding decentralized forest governance: an application of the institutional analysis and development framework (2006, background): “Second, most researchers agree that positive outcomes in a decentralized environmental-governance framework rely on local governments being downwardly accountable to resource users (e.g., Crook & Manor, 1998; Agrawal & Ribot, 1999; de Oliveira, 2002; Ribot, 2002).”