Who talks with whom? The role of repeated interactions in decentralized forest governance

By K. Andersson. 2004

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd71fd1d6c21223aeb6d047fdf1593892751aafa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Elinor Ostrom
2. K. Andersson
3. C. Gibson
4. Stefan Partelow
5. Carl Folke
6. E. Araral
7. Harini Nagendra
8. Manuel González de Molina

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Elinor Ostrom
2. C. Gibson
3. K. Andersson

In Safety Research

1. Elinor Ostrom
2. C. Gibson
3. K. Andersson
4. J. Bergh
5. Sigrid Stagl
6. Charles Bellemare
7. Sabine Kröger

Citations in the corpus

• Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective (2008, background): “Most studies are qualitative, in-depth studies of local government experiences in single countries or subnational regions for a single point in time (Larson 2002; Pacheco and Kaimowitz 1998; Andersson 2004; Nygren 2005).”
• Decentralization's Effects on Educational Outcomes in Bolivia and Colombia (2008, unknown): “Other authors, such as Andersson (2004), Larson (2002), McCarthy (2004) and Nygren (2005), are more cautious, arguing broadly that decentralization is a complex, problematic phenomenon, but may ultimately have positive effects on local welfare.”
• Decentralized governance and environmental change: Local institutional moderation of deforestation in Bolivia (2007, background): “Such works generally analyze how local institutional arrangements influence the local governments’ administrative performance, such as public participation (Blair, 2000; Fiszbein, 1997; Larson, 2002; O’Neill, 2003), downward accountability (Agrawal & Ribot, 1999; Crook & Manor, 1998; Smoke, 2003), r”
• Understanding decentralized forest governance: an application of the institutional analysis and development framework (2006, methodology): “, Crook & Manor, 1998; Agrawal & Ribot, 1999; Pacheco, 2000; Agrawal & Ostrom, 2001; Larson, 2002), most of this extant work focuses exclusively on the performance of a single local organization such as a village council, a municipal government, or a regional agency (but see Carrol, 1992; Brinkerhof”