Seeding rate and genotype effect on agronomic performance and end-use quality of winter wheat

By B. Geleta, M. Atak, P. Stephen Baenziger, L. Nelson, D. D. Baltenesperger, Kent M. Eskridge, M. J. Shipman, D. R. Shelton. 2002

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Genetic improvement trends in agronomic performances and end-use quality characteristics among hard red winter wheat cultivars in Nebraska (2005, background): “The seeding rate was chosen as being representative of traditional seeding rates for the diverse years the cultivars were grown and because recent research indicated that grain yield and end-use quality are unaffected by larger seeding rate changes than would be expected by differing cultivar kernel”
Impact of Spring Wheat Planting Density, Row Spacing, and Mechanical Weed Control on Yield, Grain Protein, and Economic Return in Maine (2012, background): “…al. (2003a) reported no difference in grain protein across seeding rates of 325 and 625 plants m22 and 123 and 371 plants m22, respectively, while others found elevated seeding rates can reduce protein due to increased intraspecific competition for soil N (Arduini et al. 2006; Gooding et al. 2002).”
Grain yield, dry matter accumulation and remobilization, and root respiration in winter wheat as affected by seeding rate and root pruning. (2010, unknown): “Many studies have foundapositive correlation between seeding rate and both grain yield and mean kernel weight (Blue et al., 1990; Geleta et al., 2002; Wood et al., 2003; Arduini et al., 2006), but our study suggests that this correlation depends on availability of moisture.”