The accuracy of self-reported smoking: a systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status.

By S. Connor Gorber, Sean Schofield-Hurwitz, J. Hardt, Geneviève Levasseur, Mark S. Tremblay. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2009

1,066 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Physiology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6ede4c1309eb4d28af8f82b49d44d1f51f28a95

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Physiology

1. A. Subar
2. F. Thompson

Citations in the corpus

• Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a survey (2018, background): “Research has shown that smoking may be underestimated by up to 47% [30].”
• Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data. (2015, background): “For example, self-report of the intensity and duration of cigarette smoking allowed researchers to detect important associations between smoking and chronic disease risk despite biomarker evidence that cigarette smoking is underreported (9).”