Increasing Returns versus National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of US-C
By Keith Head, John Ries. 2001
704 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6d1f2e04fbe8bc2ad916fb2f100cf64f416a74a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Thierry Mayer
- Keith Head
- D. Novy
- S. Poncet
- Stephen J. Redding
- H. Garretsen
- Marius Brülhart
- Gilles Duranton
Citations in the corpus
- Migrants and Market Potential in Spain over The XXth Century: A Test Of The New Economic Geography (2007, result): “However, the values obtained are consistent with those obtained elsewhere (Hanson, 2005, Head and Ries, 2001).”
- Trade Crisis? What Trade Crisis? (2013, background): “18% over the same period.(16) All these indicators point to the conclusion that there has been a credit crunch in Belgium in general and in the manufacturing sector in particular.”
- The Impact of Regional and Sectoral Productivity Changes on the U.S. Economy (2014, neutral): “17Here, we follow the literature that infers trade costs from observable trade flows, as in Head and Ries (2001) and Anderson and van Wincoop (2003).”
- Structural gravity equations with intensive and extensive margins (2010, neutral): “Hummels (2001a) obtains an average value of 5.6 and that in Head and Ries (2001) is 7.9.16 Nevertheless, the comparison of our sectoral estimates of σ with those of Broda and Weinstein (2006) is satisfactory.”
- The empirics of new economic geography (2010, neutral): “Other empirical studies finding evidence of home market effects using international trade data include Feenstra, Markusen, and Rose (2001), Head and Ries (2001), and Hanson and Xiang (2004).”
- From Periphery to Core: Economic Adjustments to High Speed Rail (2010, background): “The first focuses on the location of production and exports, which according to KRUGMAN (1980) should concentrate in the close to large markets (DAVIS & WEINSTEIN, 1999, 2003; HANSON & CHONG, 2004; HEAD & RIES, 2001).”
- Public expenditure, international specialisation and agglomeration (2004, background): “Proposition 2 can also be viewed in terms of the literature on home-market e7ects (Davis and Weinstein, 2003; Head and Ries, 2001; Head et al., 2002).”
- Trade Costs and the Home Market Effect (2008, positive): “7 The measure of trade freeness proposed by Head and Ries (2001) has three main qualities.”
- Trade Costs in the Developing World: 1996–2010 (2015, background): “Novy (2013), following Head and Ries (2001), takes a different approach to trade costs, starting from a ‘top down’ perspective.1 In other words, he derives an all-inclusive measure of trade costs based on the observed pattern of trade and production, without the need to work up from individual…”
- In Search of the Armington Elasticity (2014, neutral): “where the second line makes use of (37) and we define”