The impact of aging and technological relatedness on agglomeration externalities: a survival analysis

By Frank M. H. Neffke, Martin Henning, Ron A. Boschma. 2012

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b68993e04ddfdf65f7917090975de5e0a15f012b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Koen Frenken
2. Ron A. Boschma
3. E. Stam
4. Elena Cefis
5. Anne Nygaard Tanner
6. F. Quatraro
7. Michaela Trippl
8. Pierre-Alexandre Balland

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Koen Frenken
2. E. Stam
3. Ron A. Boschma
4. Elena Cefis
5. J. Essletzbichler
6. Pierre-Alexandre Balland

Citations in the corpus

• Industrial Dynamics and Clusters: A Survey (2015, background): “And in a study on plant survival in Sweden (1970–2004), NEFFKE et al. (2012) found no evidence for localization economies, while the local presence of technologically related industries substantially increased survival rates of plants.”
• Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience (2015, background): “…indeed demonstrated that industries are less likely to exit a region when these are technologically related to other local industries (NEFFKE et al., 2011a), and that especially young firms have higher survival rates in a region that is well endowed with related industries (NEFFKE et al., 2012).”
• Who Benefits from Agglomeration? (2015, unknown): “ALCACER (2006) and KNOBEN et al. (2010) advanced related arguments about firm characteristics and agglomeration; while POTTER and WATTS (2011) and NEFFKE et al. (2011, 2012) examined agglomeration within an explicitly evolutionary framework, showing how the life cycle of industries regulates the…”