Bridging the gap between laboratory experiments and naturally occurring markets: An inferred valuation method

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments (2018, unknown): “example, Mulligan and Hunter (2003) find that only one of every 89,000 votes casted in U.”
Consumer Willingness to Pay for Livestock Credence Attribute Claim Verification (2010, methodology): “Consistent with Lusk and Norwood (2009a), it is likely that the indirect WTP estimates, for the case in which evidence of social desirability bias can be found, are a more accurate reflection of people’s actual WTP than the direct questioning WTP estimates.”
Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods (2021, methodology): “A pioneering application of a closely related methodology in CEs consists of the studies of Lusk and Norwood (2009a) and Carlsson et al. (2010), who used a third-party (indirect) approach also known as the inferred valuation method (Lusk and Norwood, 2009b) to reduce HB, though neither makes any…”
An Inferred Valuation Method (2009, methodology): “There is some debate among economists on whether the portion of WTP attributable to motivations such as warm glow or altruism should be used in costbenefit analysis (e.g., see McConnell 1997).”