The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis

455 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations (2017, background): “However, the empirical studies of partner proximity studies report mixed results, which can be attributed to the interlinkages between different types of partner proximities, in addition to other partner technological and relation attributes (Muscio and Pozzali 2013; Petruzzelli 2011).”
How firms collaborate with public research organizations : The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects (2016, background): “Partners' technological relatedness has an inverted U-shaped relationship with innovation value in the context of university-industry collaborations (Petruzzelli, 2011).”
What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature (2018, background): “Although most evidence is in favour of a short distance between collaborating partners, there are also results to the contrary, which indicate that successful IUCs tend to occur particularly between partners who are geographically at some distance from one another (Petruzzelli 2011).”
What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation?—Project-level evidence from Germany (2012, background): “Particularly, a history of repeated interaction with the same cooperation partner(s) might be most conducive to the establishment of cooperation routines and trust-based relationships (Petruzzelli, 2011).”