Adjustment costs and the identification of Cobb Douglas production functions

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Management as a Technology? (2016, unknown): “Pi = ( Y N ) 1 ρ Y −1 ρ i = BY − 1 ρ i (4)”
Firm Productivity and Exports: Evidence from Ethiopian Manufacturing (2009, background): “Ackerberg and Caves (2003) and Bond and Soderbom (2004) criticised the proxy method, on the basis of the problems of identifying the parameters.”
Age and productivity : evidence from linked employer employee data (2009, background): “Bond and Söderbom (2005) and Ackerberg et al. (2006) question the identification of these approaches, even for cases where the underlying economic assumptions are 6 The estimates and the test results for the system GMM Minumum Distance Estimator (MDE) are available on request.”
Structural Identi…cation of Production Functions (2006, result): “This result is related to, but distinctly di¤erent from, the complete non-identi cation result in Bond and Söderbom (2005), which assumes that b = 0.”
R&D and Productivity: Estimating Endogenous Productivity (2013, background): “One may then also have to confront an issue raised by Bond and Söderbom (2005).”
Identification Properties of Recent Production Function Estimators (2015, background): “This is because Bond and Söderbom (2005) (for the Cobb–Douglas case) and Gandhi, Navarro, and Rivers (2014) (for the general case) have shown that under the scalar unobservable assumptions of OP, LP, and our procedure, these gross output production functions are not identified without imposing…”