Identifying cooperative behavior: some experimental results in a prisoner's dilemma game

By J. Brosig. 2002

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b60840f5061d705e74e8b2c9bc3bbd61e85b49ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. György Szabó
2. Dan Sperber
3. Joachim Weimann
4. N. Baumard
5. Gábor Fáth
6. J. Brosig

In Safety Research

1. Dan Sperber
2. N. Baumard
3. György Szabó
4. Joachim Weimann
5. Gábor Fáth
6. J. Brosig
7. Danila Serra
8. Hans-Theo Normann

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Dan Sperber
2. N. Baumard
3. György Szabó
4. Gábor Fáth
5. Joachim Weimann
6. J. Brosig
7. Matjaz Perc
8. Attila Szolnoki

Citations in the corpus

• Evolutionary games on graphs (2006, background): “, is a linear combination of his own monetary payoff un and the opponent’s monetary payoff um, where the signs of the coefficients and depend on the player’s type (Brosig, 2002; Weibull, 2004). Clearly such a dependence may redefine the incentive structure of the game, and may transform a would-be s”
• Moral Reputation: An Evolutionary and Cognitive Perspective (2012, background): “Participants in experiments are able to predict in advance whether or not their partners intend to cooperate (Brosig, 2002; Frank, Gilovich and Regan, 1993).”
• The Effect of Communication Media on Cooperation (2002, background): “Ockenfels and Selten (2000) and Brosig (2002) tested implications of Frank’s theory.”