Impact of Event Scale: psychometric properties.

By E. Sundin, M. Horowitz. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2002

716 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Behavioral Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b60530283a466811b5d97621fb5fe66052d4c232

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Behavioral Neuroscience

1. N. Garnefski
2. V. Kraaij
3. Netty Baan
4. M. Radey
5. D. Weiss
6. Charles R. Figley
7. J. V. Carney
8. Brian E Bride

In Clinical Psychology

1. N. Garnefski
2. V. Kraaij
3. M. Radey
4. Charles R. Figley
5. Brian E Bride
6. S. Galea
7. A. Nandi
8. Netty Baan

Citations in the corpus

• The Impact of Event Scale: Revised (2007, background): “Sundin and Horowitz (2002) recently summarized published research on the original IES’s psychometric characteristics.”
• Perceptions of Bullying and Associated Trauma during Adolescence. (2008, methodology): “Test-retest reliability has shown internal reliabilities to be consistent across studies (Sundin & Horowitz, 2002).”
• Psychological distress and cognitive emotion regulation strategies among farmers who fell victim to the foot-and-mouth crisis (2005, background): “Research supports the validity of the IES as a measure of trauma-related distress (Joseph, 2000; Sundin & Horowitz, 2002).”
• Measuring Compassion Fatigue (2007, methodology): “Across 18 published studies using the IES, unweighted averages for coefficient alpha were reported as .86 for intrusion and .82 for avoidance (Sundin & Horowitz, 2002).”
• Psychometric Properties of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised in Patients One Year After Burn Injury (2010, methodology): “It contains 15 items reflecting symptoms of intrusion and avoidance.(22) The IES was revised by Weiss and Marmar(23) to cover all three major symptom clusters of PTSD according to the DSM-IV.”
• The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. (2005, background): “.85) for periods less than 2 weeks, and the measure has demonstrated strong sensitivity by capturing changes in clinical presentation over time (Horowitz et al., 1979) and reflecting greater subjective distress among more traumatic experiences (Sundin & Horowitz, 2002).”
• The epidemiology of post-traumatic stress disorder after disasters. (2005, background): “Although a full discussion of the implications of the use of different instruments is beyond the scope of this review, we note that differing sensitivities and specificities of screening instruments and their potential role in shaping assessments of PTSD have been well documented (52–55).”