The epidemiology of post-traumatic stress disorder after disasters.
By S. Galea, A. Nandi, D. Vlahov. Epidemiologic Reviews, 2005
1,277 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medical Services
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79e04968a0a2a678a455743d286596f636507000
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Emergency Medical Services
Citations in the corpus
- Racism and Ethnoviolence as Trauma: Enhancing Professional Training (2010, positive): “that to create effective assessment environments, service providers and researchers ought to self-examine with respect to their own racial identity development and cultural orientations (Helms & Cook, 1999; Helms, Henze, Satiani, & Mascher, 2005). Clinically, it is necessary to be aware of and be se”
- Rescuers at risk: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of the worldwide current prevalence and correlates of PTSD in rescue workers (2011, background): “However, it is comparable to the 2–17% prevalence estimates found in US Vietnam and Iraq veterans [62, 63] and lower than the 19–39% found in direct disaster victims [64].”
- Racism and Ethnoviolence as Trauma Enhancing Professional and Research Training (2012, methodology): “Table 1 uses Helms’s (1995) social interaction model to describe four types of assessment environments that might either enhance or impede the assessment process.”
- Community identity and collective efficacy: A social cure for traumatic stress in post‐earthquake Nepal (2017, background): “Galea, Nandi, and Vlahov (2005) in their comprehensive review of the literature document evidence that PTS tends to be lower after natural disasters (e.g. floods, earthquakes) rather than after human-made/technological disasters (e.g. nuclear incident, air crashes).”
- Post-traumatic stress disorder following disasters: a systematic review (2007, methodology): “Finally, we compared our final sample to previous review papers (Brewin et al. 2000 ; Norris et al. 2002 ; Galea et al. 2005) to verify that our search was successful and its results were comprehensive.”