Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway

By Matthias Schröter, David N. Barton, R. Remme, Lars Hein. 2014

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5e8765af359ad7a73aa7db6977cc9b45081be05

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective (2014, background): “The spatially explicit assessment of ecosystem’s capacity to generate services and their actual flows can support the monitoring of ecosystem exploitation (Schröter et al., 2014).”
Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management (2016, background): “Benefits are associated with human well-being and the value system (for studies discussing the concepts of capacity and flow and cascade model of ecosystem services see Haines-Young and Potschin, 2010; Layke et al., 2012; Villamagna et al., 2013; Maes et al., 2014; Schröter et al., 2014).”
Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification (2014, background): “The degree of rivalry indicates how much the use of one service by an individual or a user group impacts the quality or quantity of that service available to other users (Schröter et al. 2014; Kemkes et al. 2010).”
Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg province, the Netherlands. (2015, background): “While some empirical experience has been developed with biophysical ecosystem accounting (Remme et al., 2014; Schröter et al., 2014a, in press), only few studies apply monetary ecosystem accounting aligned with SNA principles for multiple ES in a spatially explicit way (e.g. Campos et al., 2014).”
Wild food in Europe: A synthesis of knowledge and data of terrestrial wild food as an ecosystem service (2014, neutral): “We consider both the flow (the process of collecting) and the demand (Schröter et al., 2014; Villamagna et al., 2013).”
Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services (2016, background): “…between what we call the ‘potential ecosystem service’ provided by the ecosystem, similar to what Tallis et al. (2012) describe as service ‘supply’ and Schröter et al. (2014a) and Villamagna et al. (2014) term ‘capacity’, and the service that is actually used by humans, that L. Jones et al. /…”