Life‐Cycle Variations in the Association between Current and Lifetime Income: Replication and Extension for Sweden

By Anders Böhlmark, Matthew J. Lindquist. Journal of Labor Economics, 2006

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Trends in Intergenerational Income Mobility (2006, background): “8 The results in Haider and Solon (2006) and Bohlmark and Lindquist (2006) suggest that the errors-in-variables bias from nonclassical left-side measurement error in child’s log current income as a proxy for log long-run income is inconsequential if current income is measured at around age 40.”
Intergenerational Income Mobility in Urban China (2012, background): “JEL Codes: D10, D31 Keywords: intergenerational mobility, political party membership, transgenerational persistence 1.”
The likely impact of COVID-19 on education: Reflections based on the existing literature and recent international datasets (2020, background): “Since earnings around age 40 are considered to be a good predictor of life-cycle earnings (Böhlmark and Lindquist 2006), we take as reference the gross monthly full-time equivalent (FTE) earnings of those whose age was between 39 and 41 in 2018 (euro 2,455; source EU-SILC).”
Two-Sample Two-Stage Least Squares (TSTSLS) Estimates of Earnings Mobility: How Consistent are They? (2014, unknown): “6Böhlmark and Lindquist (2006) suggest lifecycle bias is ap-”
Intergenerational Earnings Mobility: Changes across Cohorts in Britain (2008, result): “The aim of this section is to produce estimates of intergenerational mobility comparable with Dearden et al. (1997), Blanden et al.”