Ageism: A Review of Research and Policy Implications

By D. Bugental, J. Hehman. 2007

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5a922c50ed2bb491cbdca22a783cc388694b62c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Mark Schaller
2. Steven L. Neuberg

In Health

1. Ruth A. Lamont
2. Dominic Abrams
3. Mark Schaller
4. Steven L. Neuberg
5. H. Swift
6. Lisbeth Drury

In Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

1. Ruth A. Lamont
2. Dominic Abrams
3. Mark Schaller
4. Steven L. Neuberg
5. H. Swift
6. Lisbeth Drury

Citations in the corpus

• Danger, Disease, and the Nature of Prejudice(s) (2012, background): “A variety of different processes have been suggested as contributing to ageism, and there is some support for several of them (Bugental & Hehman, 2007).”
• The Risks of Ageism Model: How Ageism and Negative Attitudes toward Age Can Be a Barrier to Active Aging (2017, background): “However, at present, in line with the present article, most ageism research focuses on how it affects older people (Bugental & Hehman, 2007), and its potentially enduring and severe consequences for older people (Garstka, Schmitt, Branscombe, & Hummert, 2004).”