Affective priming with liked and disliked persons: Prime visibility determines congruency and incongruency effects

By R. Banse. 2001

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reliability of Implicit Self–Esteem Measures Revisited (2011, methodology): “We did not counterbalance the sequence of the tasks because our aim was to optimize the reliability of individual differences (for a detailed argument, see Banse, 2001).”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “It should be noted, however, that correlations between affective priming effects and criterion variables are sometimes small or even absent (e.g., Banse, 1999, 2001; Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000).”
Alexithymia and the automatic processing of affective information: Evidence from the affective priming paradigm (2006, result): “Systematic facilitation and inhibition effects observed as a result of the congruence or incongruence between the valence of the prime and the target support previous findings observed in affective-priming tasks (Banse, 2001; Klauer, 1998; Suslow, 1998; Suslow et al., 2001).”
Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, background): “…seem to be a critical issue for quite a number of implicit measures, showing internal consistency scores that are clearly unsatisfactory from a psychometric point of view (e.g., Banse, 1999, 2001; Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000; Cunningham et al., 2001; Olson & Fazio, 2003; Teige et al., 2004).”