Organization of corporate web pages: Publics and functions

By Stuart L. Esrock, Greg Leichty. 2000

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b55c606fb4771dc860b4f59c6dc8490eb727f2b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Ilan Alon
2. Kerri Anne Crowne

In Information Systems

1. Shaomin Li
2. Ilan Alon

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-presentations (2002, unknown): “The study focused on corporate signature web sites which are designed to present "the identities that a corporation claims for itself as a unit" (Esrock and Leichty, 2000, p. 329).”
• Usage of public corporate communications of social responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) (2010, background): “Web sites and annual reports provide valuable information because they target a wide variety of stakeholders (Esrock and Leichty, 2000).”
• Corporate social responsibility communication of Chinese and global corporations in China (2009, background): “Recently, corporate websites have become an attractive tool in communicating companies’ CSR activities to their stakeholders (Chaudhi & Wang, 2007; Esrock & Leichty, 2000; Fukukawa & Moon, 2004; Pollach, 2003).”
• Defining corporate social responsibility (2007, background): “Other scholars have recently investigated the public presentation of CSR, similarly choosing a more grounded approach and taking advantage of the world wide web (Esrock and Leichty, 1998; Esrock and Leichty, 2000; Maignan and Ralston, 2002; Snider et al., 2003).”
• The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Football Business: Towards the Development of a Conceptual Model (2008, background): “The analysis draws on the websites of clubs/teams, leagues and bodies, which have been analysed in their respective national context, because they are an iconic representation of professional organizations and their ‘‘reality’’ (Esrock & Leichty, 2000).”