Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism

By Pierre-Marie Roy, I. Colombet, Pierre Durieux, G. Chatellier, H. Sors, Guy Meyer. British medical journal, 2005

1,403 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Hematology, Internal Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b557d1bc9016b20335c54c28ea1b0e277b2f5e79

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

In Hematology

S. Konstantinides

In Internal Medicine

Citations in the corpus

ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism (2014, methodology): “Echocardiographic examination is not recommended as part of the diagnostic work-up in haemodynamically stable, normotensive patients with suspected (not high-risk) PE.(157) This is in contrast to suspected high-risk PE, in which the absence of echocardiographic signsof RV overload or dysfunction pra”
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) (2019, methodology): “An analysis from the PIOPED II study suggested that a highprobability V/Q scan could confirm PE, although other sources suggest that the positive predictive value of a high-probability lung scan is not sufficient to confirm PE in patients with a low clinical probability.(123,124) Performing only a p”
An Analysis of Driver Inattention Using a Case-Crossover Approach On 100-Car Data: Final Report (2010, methodology): “Finally, the case-crossover approach has been used to calculate relative risk in a variety of other transportation safety studies investigating different types of driver distraction, such as cell phone use (Redelmeier & Tibshirani, 1997; McEvoy et al., 2005).”
Leaders, followers, and time (2008, background): “…same time such as driving and talking on a cell phone simultaneously, which happens to be a poor combination of tasks to engage in at the same time because doing so increases the chances of an automobile accident occurring by three to four times (Redelmeier & Tibshirani, 1997; McEvoy et al., 2005).”
[2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism]. (2014, positive): “with a non-diagnostic lung scan and low clinical probability of PE havea lowprevalence of confirmedPE.(94,157,203) The negativepredict-”
The impact of a naturalistic hands-free cellular phone task on heart rate and simulated driving performance in two age groups (2011, background): “It is well established that cellular phone usage adversely impacts safety (McEvoy et al., 2005; Redelmeier & Tibshirani, 1997; Violanti, 1998).”
Me, my mobile, and I : the role of self- and prototypical identity influences in the prediction of mobile phone behavior (2007, background): “As recent studies have revealed that using a mobile phone when driving (McEvoy et al., 2005).”
Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism (2008, background): “scan and a low clinical probability of PE have a very low prevalence of PE.(60,62,116) The NPV of this combination is further reduced by the absence of a DVT on lower limb CUS.”
Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data (2016, background): “Some epidemiological studies conducted overseas (21) and laboratory studies in the United States (22) have shown that such behavior is risky, whereas smaller NDSs and other epidemiological studies have shown that it is not (8, 23).”
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. (2007, neutral): ““We used a case-crossover design, a variation of a case-control design that is appropriate when a brief exposure (driver's phone use) causes a transient rise in the risk of a rare outcome (a crash). We compared a driver's use of a mobile phone at the estimated tim”
Driver distraction: a review of the current state-of-the-knowledge (2008, neutral): “A similar study was undertaken in Perth, Western Australia (McEvoy et al., 2005), in which phone records were obtained for approximately 500 drivers involved in crashes that required hospital treatment.”
Mobile phone use while driving: An investigation of the beliefs influencing drivers' hands-free and hand-held mobile phone use (2010, background): “The potential for hands-free mobile phone use while driving to be no safer than using a hand-held mobile phone (Matthews et al., 2003; McEvoy et al., 2005), however, suggests that the implementation of strategies to increase awareness of the risks of this behaviour for all drivers may be warranted.”