Systematic Review in Software Engineering
By Jorge Calmon de Almeida Biolchini, Paula Gomes Mian. 2005
559 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5527bcf459fb62f280a969ce9c75fc743411f10
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Maosong Sun
- Kai Petersen
- Zhiyuan Liu
- Weize Chen
- Cheng Yang
- Sairam Vakkalanka
- David Budgen
- Ludwik Kuzniarz
Citations in the corpus
- A Map of Threats to Validity of Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (2016, methodology): “We used Google Scholar to check the papers with reference to the three EBSE seminal papers [1][13][14] and two versions of the guidelines on SLRs in SE [2][12].”
- Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A tertiary study (2010, background): “template [51] which they adopted for their review [23].”
- Communicative Agents for Software Development (2023, background): “It is a highly complex and intricate activity that demands meticulous attention to detail due to its long development cycles [17; 4].”
- The Emergent Role of Digital Technologies in the Circular Economy: A Review (2017, methodology): “The research methodology was based on [9] in an effort to provide a replicable process, and limit the bias of the research.”
- Experiences using systematic review guidelines (2006, background): “[1] too late for it to impact our study, we believe that their approach could contribute to the operation of success of a central index of systematic reviews for software engineering.”
- Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update (2015, methodology): “In this section we propose updated guidelines for systematic mapping consolidating the practices identified through this mapping study and the practices suggested in the guidelines proposed by other researchers [48,1,2,56,57,49].”
- Personal Health Records: A Systematic Literature Review (2017, unknown): “Moreover, to mitigate threats to validity, we followed the well-documented study protocol available in the studies by Biolchini et al [35] and Qiu et al [36].”