Political Expertise and the Use of Ideology: Moderating Effects of Evaluative Motivation

By Christopher M. Federico, Monica C. Schneider. 2007

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b548225400f93df97b6475c75b8efb2bd83b38fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. James N. Druckman
2. John T. Jost
3. Christopher M. Federico

In Political Science and International Relations

1. James N. Druckman
2. John T. Jost
3. Chadly Stern
4. Christopher M. Federico
5. Thomas J. Leeper

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John T. Jost
2. Chadly Stern
3. Jaime L. Napier
4. H. Nam
5. Christopher M. Federico
6. Erin P. Hennes
7. James N. Druckman
8. J. Kuklinski

Citations in the corpus

• Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. (2009, background): “…to adopt positions that are right-of-center, evaluate conservative political figures more favorably , and vote for candidates on the right (e.g., Conover & Feldman 1981, Evans et al. 1996, Federico & Schneider 2007, Jacoby 1991, Kerlinger 1984, Knutsen 1995, Lavine & Gschwend 2006, Zaller 1992).”
• Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects over Time (2010, unknown): “…develop more organized attitudes (e.g., more ideologically constrained attitudes) that structure opinions across issues (Druckman and Nelson 2003; Federico and Schneider 2007; Jarvis and Petty 1996, 1006).5 Second, attitude strength will be influenced by whether individuals form and update…”
• Not All Ideologies are Created Equal: Epistemic, Existential, and Relational Needs Predict System-Justifying Attitudes (2012, background): “…for cognition (i.e., possessing a low level of motivation to engage in cognitive activity; Cacioppo & Petty, 1982; Cacioppo, Petty, & Kao, 1984) is correlated with political conservatism and harsh punishment of those who threaten the social order (e.g., Federico & Schneider, 2007; Sargent, 2004).”
• The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research: Political Psychological Approaches to Voting and Public Opinion (2009, background): “McGraw and her colleagues also identify several individual difference moderators including issue importance, uncertainty, sophistication, and personality factors (e.g., McGraw et al. 1990, 2003; McGraw and Dolan 2007; also see Bizer et al. 2004; Holbrook 2006; Federico and Schneider 2007 ).”