Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data
By Elanor Colleoni, Alessandro Rozza, Adam Arvidsson. 2014
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b53ee84906ab714bb2e124c61931aea42690f2f5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Sociology and Political Science
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Computing (2021, background): “The notion of increasing greenness in urban environments not only connects with the aesthetic evaluation but also show beneficial physiological response compared to spaces with little vegetation [Qin et al. 2013].”
- Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media (2020, background): “Self-reinforcing homophilic interaction patterns (interactional polarization; Colleoni et al., 2014; Mutz, 2006; Sunstein, 2001) aggravate positional polarization (Abramowitz, 2015; Fiorina & Abrams, 2008) and contribute to pronounced hostility (affective polarization; Iyengar et al., 2012; Lelkes,…”
- Homophily, Group Size, and the Diffusion of Political Information in Social Networks: Evidence from Twitter (2016, unknown): “Most research examining homophily on the internet and, more specifically, social media measures network structure but not communications (e.g., Colleoni et al., 2014) or communications but not network structure (e.g., Adamic and Glance, 2005).4 As emphasized by our model, measuring exposure to…”
- The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online (2019, background): “…which some have likened to a “dumpster fire” (Maza, 2018) and often represent partisan bias more than thoughtful and balanced discussions of issues (Bakshy, Messing, & Adamic, 2015; Barberá et al., 2015; Brady et al., 2017; Colleoni, Rozza, & Arvidsson, 2014; Himelboim, Mccreery, & Smith, 2013).”