Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics

By Magnus Dahlquist, Göran Robertsson. 2001

848 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b53b563e4caaa81a12a4bf4193b1f816daa1bde5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

Cultural influences on home bias and international diversification by institutional investors (2011, background): “Numerous studies document geographical biases in portfolio allocations (French and Poterba, 1991; Coval and Moskowitz, 1999; Kang and Stulz, 1997; Dahlquist and Robertsson, 2001; Karlsson and Norden, 2007).”
Which Investors Fear Expropriation? Evidence from Investors' Portfolio Choices (2006, neutral): “Since the largest companies are a larger proportion of the sample of Dahlquist et al. (2003), this can explain why they find that the difference between control and cash flow rights does not seem to affect the holdings of foreign investors.”
Disclosure, Corporate Governance and Foreign Share Ownership on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange (2007, neutral): “Our results also indicate that foreign share ownership is not significantly related to share ownership by the top-10 shareholders, thus contradicting Dahlquist and Robertsson (2001), who found a negative significant relationship.”
Hybrid support vector machine rule extraction method for discovering the preferences of stock market investors: Evidence from Montenegro (2015, methodology): “Foreign institutional investors tend to invest in firms with large market capitalization (these results are consistent with those documented by Dahlquist and Robertsson (2001), in the Swedish stock market and, by Covrig et al. (2006), in eleven developed stock markets) and low to middle M/B ratio. T”
Information costs and home bias: an analysis of US holdings of foreign equities (2004, neutral): “14 9.4 0.12 0.88 27.2 France 0.71 2.9 0.25 0.75 29.3 Canada 0.59 2.4 0.25 0.75 44.4 Germany 0.54 3.5 0.15 0.85 17.6 Italy 0.35 1.5 0.24 0.76 42.5 Other advanced countries Netherlands 0.89 2.0 0.45 0.55 80.7 Switzerland 0.52 2.5 0.21 0.79 1.3 Sweden 0.32 1.2 0.28 0.72 34.0 Spain 0.21 1.2 0.17 0.83 39”
Ownership Concentration, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistan (2008, background): “The positive affect of foreign ownership on performance is supported by Dahlquist and Robertson (2001). They argue that foreign investors can complement the inadequate or inefficient monitoring of domestic institutions.”
Which Past Returns Affect Trading Volume (2009, neutral): “Similar studies are, for example, Dahlquist and Robertsson (2001) and Ng and Wu (2006) and the references cited therein. to investigate the relationship between past returns and trading volume.”
The Overseas Listing Decision: New Evidence of Proximity Preference (2004, neutral): “Kang and Stulz (1997) and Dahlquist and Robertsson (2001) observe that foreign investors tend to hold larger positions in firms that produce tradable output.”
The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world (2008, neutral): “market and in Dahlquist and Robertsson (2001) for the Swedish market.”