Individual access to preferred habitat affects fitness components in female roe deer Capreolus capreolus

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The response of fawn survival to changes in habitat quality varies according to cohort quality and spatial scale (2005, background): “More recently, Nilsen et al. (2004) show that roe deer does with the highest home-range quality index (estimated by the availability of woodland) during winter produced the largest litters.”
Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer (2008, unknown): “…in roe deer, fecundity tends to be density dependent and related to maternal body mass and habitat quality (Stubbe 1984; Andersen and Linnell 2000; Nilsen et al. 2004; Focardi et al. 2006; Saïd and Servanty 2005), whereas maternal body mass and thus fecundity are also related to density at birth…”
Space use of moose in relation to food availability (2005, methodology): “To assess the relationship between home-range size and food availability, we used linear regression with percentage availability of food-rich habitat types within the home range as an indicator of forage availability (Smith and Schaefer 2002; Nilsen et al. 2004).”
Effects of hunting with hounds on a non-target species living on the edge of a protected area (2011, background): “Deciduous coppice forest was the most suitable among the available habitat types for roe deer, affecting its presence and distribution (Bongi et al., 2008; Nilsen et al., 2004; Saïd et al., 2005).”