The response of fawn survival to changes in habitat quality varies according to cohort quality and spatial scale

By Nathalie Pettorelli, J. Gaillard, N. Yoccoz, P. Duncan, D. Maillard, D. Delorme, G. Laere, C. Toïgo. 2005

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1d60d47be6e5bc0f8c80dd803cb3440107146a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. F. Ferretti
2. S. Lovari

In Genetics

1. S. Lovari

Citations in the corpus

• Behavioural interference between ungulate species: roe are not on velvet with fallow deer (2011, background): “Roe deer rely on food intake, rather than fat reserves, for reproduction (Hewison et al. 1996; Andersen et al. 2000): especially in females, a reduced food intake in spring, when pregnancy and lactation occur, can affect reproductive success (Pettorelli et al. 2005; McLoughlin et al. 2007).”
• Using a proxy of plant productivity (NDVI) to find key periods for animal performance: the case of roe deer (2006, unknown): “Some imprecision in the exact spatial location of the pixel have been reported before (Pettorelli et al. 2005b), especially at the 1 km scale.”