Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes.

By P. Amrhein, W. Miller, C. Yahne, M. Palmer, Laura Fulcher. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2003

743 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5140cb10cecb839a307f338395da53639bd14bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. T. Moyers
2. Michael E. Levin
3. S. Rollnick
4. G. Rose
5. W. Miller
6. M. Hildebrandt
7. M. Villatte
8. J. Martinez

In Epidemiology

1. W. Miller
2. G. Rose
3. T. Moyers
4. S. Rollnick
5. D. Forrester
6. Adam M. Grant

In Social Psychology

1. T. Moyers
2. G. Rose
3. W. Miller
4. S. Rollnick
5. J. Martinez
6. M. Pirritano
7. C. Yahne
8. Steven C. Hayes

Citations in the corpus

• Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. (2009, background): “Subsequent psycholinguistic analyses suggested the reason why the intervention may have failed to yield the usual effect (Amrhein et al., 2003).”
• Toward a Theory of Motivational Interviewing (2009, background): “Amrhein then proceeded to examine what clients in each of these groups had said during their MI session (Amrhein et al., 2003).”
• Motivational Interviewing in Groups (2006, positive): “While none of these four types of Change Talk independently predict outcome, they all predict an increasing Commitment to Change, which in turn is strongly related to positive outcomes (Amrhein et al., 2003).”
• A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing. (2004, methodology): “These changes of in-session client response are predictive of better behavior change outcomes (Amrhein et al., 2003; Miller et al., 1993).”
• Parental resistance and social worker skills: towards a theory of motivational social work (2012, result): “This has been corroborated by more extensive recent research (Amrhein et al. 2003; Miller et al. 2004).”
• Eight Stages in Learning Motivational Interviewing (2006, methodology): “Particular attention is given to client “change talk,” verbalizations that signal desire, ability, reasons, need, or commitment to change (Amrhein et al., 2003; Miller & Rollnick, 2002).”
• Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. (2011, background): “Results of coded MI sessions indicate that clients’ stated desire, ability, reasons, and need for change all contribute to subsequent strength of commitment language, but only commitment directly predicts behavior change (Amrhein et al. 2003).”