Event-related potentials : a methods handbook
By Todd C. Handy. 2005
1,048 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b50e7331404dc0416a7e0453ad417612ca44d95c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Friedemann Pulvermüller
- Greg Hajcak
- Matthew H. Davis
- Dan Foti
- Risto Näätänen
- Steven L. Franconeri
- Cyma K Van Petten
- C. C. Duncan
Citations in the corpus
- The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data (2006, background): “Normalising the lengths of these vectors, and subsequently testing for differences , can therefore provide further information on the nature of the observed effects (Dien and Santuzzi, 2004).”
- Selective attention and audiovisual integration: is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? (2006, methodology): “Mean amplitudes were chosen instead of peak amplitudes because the (AV – [A + V]) transformations resulted in ERP waveforms that were composed of different trial numbers, which might otherwise have resulted in biased peak-amplitude measures (Handy 2005).”
- The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works (2021, background): “…electrophysiology research community shifted from a convention of plotting negative values (for microvolts) up on the y-axis to a more intuitive convention of plotting positive values up, forcing experienced researchers to relearn how to read familiar patterns that were now inverted (Handy, 2005).”
- Human EEG gamma oscillations in neuropsychiatric disorders. (2005, background): “In this case, two different types of oscillatory responses can be obtained (Basar, 1980; Herrmann et al., 2005).”
- Transfer Learning for EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Review of Progress Made Since 2016 (2020, unknown): “2) Event-related potentials (ERP) [28], [29], which are any stereotyped EEG responses to a visual, audio, or tactile stimulus.”
- Ventral striatal and medial prefrontal BOLD activation is correlated with reward-related electrocortical activity: A combined ERP and fMRI study (2011, methodology): “The FN was scored with temporospatial principal components analysis (Dien and Frishkoff, 2005) using the ERP PCA (EP) Toolkit, version 1.”
- Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels (2010, methodology): “Isel also found a qualitatively similar pattern for natives and proficient learners, but with some quantitative differences. In some cases, the influence of proficiency is more difficult to discern because multiple factors differed between conditions. For example, in Weber-Fox and Neville (1996) pro”
- Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. (2009, result): “In contrast to the substantial impact of left temporal and inferior parietal damage on the N400, patients with damage restricted to the frontal lobe have typically shown normal semantic context effects (Swick et al., 1998; Swick, 2004).”
- Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review (2008, unknown): “[22, 33]).”
- Committee report: publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. (2014, unknown): “…technique for quantifying these features is important, and there are a variety of measurement techniques available (some described below; see Fabiani, Gratton, & Federmeier, 2007, Handy, 2005, Kappenman & Luck, 2012b, Kiebel, Tallon-Baudry, & Friston, 2005, or Luck, 2005, for more information).”
- Digital filter design for electrophysiological data--a practical approach. (2015, unknown): “…which shifts the −3 dB half-energy and the −6 dB half-amplitude cutoff frequencies, and needs to be reported properly (attenuation at the one-pass −3 dB cutoff is enhanced to −6 dB for IIR and at the one-pass −6 dB cutoff to −12 dB for FIR filters; see Section 2.7 below; Edgar et al., 2005).”