Effects of habitat quality upon reintroduction success in water voles: Evidence from a replicated experiment

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Psittacine reintroductions: Common denominators of success (2012, background): “the literature (e.g., Griffith et al., 1989; Armstrong and McLean, 1995; Veltman et al., 1996; Wolf et al., 1996; Moorhouse et al., 2009; Ewen et al., 2012), yet current IUCN reintroduction guidelines (IUCN, 1998) place substantially more emphasis on selection and treatment of release stock, policy ”
Animal Translocations: What are they and why do we do them? (2012, background): “The effects of habitat quality on reintroduction success have been confirmed in recent experimental studies (Moorhouse et al., 2009).”
Captive breeding genetics and reintroduction success (2009, result): “Here, most results were obtained using a life cycle with low annual adult survival rates and high annual fecundity rates, typical of passerine (e.g., Garrett et al., 2007) or rodent (Moorhouse et al., 2009) species.”
Stress: An inevitable component of animal translocation (2010, background): “Clearly, an increase in predation on a translocated population is primarily related to the presence of predators, especially if there are new or more predators at the release location (Matson et al., 2004; McKinstry and Anderson, 2003; Moorhouse et al., 2009; Short et al., 1992), and this factor tha”