Distribution of Themisto (Amphipoda) spp. in the Barents Sea and predator-prey interactions

By P. Dalpadado, Nina Borkner, B. Bogstad, S. Mehl. 2001

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Krill, climate, and contrasting future scenarios for Arctic and Antarctic fisheries (2014, background): “Despite spatial variances within regions, krill generally appear less abundant in Arctic Ocean waters than in Antarctic waters, but they also can be important prey for higher trophic levels (Dalpadado et al., 2001; Aydin and Mueter, 2007).”
Diet of juvenile cod (age 0–2) in the Barents Sea in relation to food availability and cod growth (2004, background): “Studies by Drobysheva et al. (2003), Dalpadado and Skjoldal (1996) and Dalpadado et al. (2001) showed that krill (Thysanoessa spp.) and amphipods (Themisto spp.) were dominant macro-zooplankton in the western and central Barents Sea.”
Zooplankton biomass variation in relation to climatic conditions in the Barents Sea (2003, methodology): “Dalpadado and Skjoldal (1996) and Dalpadado et al. (2001), studying krill and amphipod abundance variations together with capelin stock size, have indicated a strong inverse relationship between capelin and macrozooplankton (>2,000 lm).”
Trophic interactions of macro-zooplankton (krill and amphipods) in the Marginal Ice Zone of the Barents Sea (2008, background): “T. libellula is a relatively epipelagic species (o50 m), whereas T. abyssorum is usually restricted to mesopelagic layers (4200 m; Dalpadado et al., 2001; Auel et al., 2002).”