Krill, climate, and contrasting future scenarios for Arctic and Antarctic fisheries

By M. M. McBride, P. Dalpadado, K. Drinkwater, Olav Rune Godø, A. Hobday, A. Hollowed, T. Kristiansen, E. Murphy, P. Ressler, S. Subbey and 2 more. 2014

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/411557e9d27c5781fd9ddd4a718f122c2178172b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. V. Siegel
2. Brett R. Scheffers
3. W. Foden
4. D. Dudgeon
5. Richard T. Corlett
6. James E. M. Watson
7. J. Watkins
8. M. Pacifici

Citations in the corpus

• The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people (2016, background): “In the Arctic, commercially important fish, such as Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma), have increased in biomass primarily because of increases in plankton production from reduced sea ice (136, 137), whereas changes in fish biomass in the Southern Ocean are less”
• Distribution, Biomass and Demography of Antarctic Krill, Euphausia superba (2016, background): “2012) and will be a key factor determining future fisheries (McBride et al. 2014).”