The status of GEO 600

By K. Strain, B. Allen, P. Aufmuth, C. Aulbert, Stanislav Babak, R. Balasubramanian, B. Barr, S. Berukoff, A. Bunkowski, G. Cagnoli and 81 more. SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, 2004

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e09095b19ff904f9b7a5a75596cd8d32cbac6db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. Ilya Mandel
2. Bernard F. Schutz
3. Michela Mapelli
4. R. O’Shaughnessy
5. D. Holz
6. Rana X. Adhikari
7. B. Sathyaprakash
8. Vicky Kalogera

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Rana X. Adhikari
2. The Ligo Scientific Collaboration
3. Bernard F. Schutz
4. Josh Willis
5. Stephen Fairhurst
6. C. Broeck
7. Walter Del Pozzo
8. B. Slagmolen

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Luca Gammaitoni
2. Helios Vocca
3. Fabio Marchesoni
4. Alper Erturk
5. Lihua Tang
6. Mohammed F. Daqaq
7. Yaowen Yang
8. Chee Kiong Soh

Citations in the corpus

• Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run (2014, methodology): “As known from previous experiments at GEO600 [44], the mode transmission of this cavity is very sensitive to angular fluctuations of the incident beam, whereby misalignment of the beam would cause non-linear power fluctuations of the transmitted light [45, 46].”