Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run

By The Ligo Scientific Collaboration, T. N. C. J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Abernathy, T. Accadia, F. Acernese, C. Adams and 858 more. 2014

966 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In 2009-2010, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observa- tory (LIGO) operated together with international partners Virgo and GEO600 as a network to search for gravitational waves of astrophysical origin. The sensitiv- ity of these detectors was limited by a combination of noise sources inherent to the instrumental design and its environment, often localized in time or frequency, that couple into the gravitational-wave readout. Here we review the performance of the LIGO instruments during this epoch, the work done to characterize the de- tectors and their data, and the effect that transient and continuous noise artefacts have on the sensitivity of LIGO to a variety of astrophysical sources.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3859aef8d52ef1bad6351ec25c4fe4009b184689

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Michela Mapelli
  2. N. Giacobbo
  3. D. Holz
  4. Mario Spera
  5. Maya Fishbach
  6. F. Antonini
  7. Ilya Mandel
  8. Luca Baiotti

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Rana X. Adhikari
  2. Yanbei Chen
  3. Luca Baiotti
  4. A. Buonanno
  5. The Ligo Scientific Collaboration
  6. K. Chatziioannou
  7. Maya Fishbach
  8. B. Slagmolen

Citations in the corpus