Moving Beyond Effectiveness in evidence Synthesis: methodological issues in the synthesis of diverse sources of evidence

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. (2009, background): “MSR also encompasses the whole review process (defined below as a sequence of five activities: question, identification, selection, appraisal and synthesis), and therefore is more comprehensive than the terms ‘synthesis of results of quantitative and qualitative studies’ (Popay, 2006) or ‘mixed appr”
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2015, background): “By pooling statistically signiﬁcant ﬁndings with non-signiﬁcant ﬁndings from all relevant studies included in the review, meta-analyses are able to calculate more precise estimates of the effects”
Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews (2015, unknown): “Conducting a literature review is an essential component in ascertaining what is known about the phenomenon, using the literature in an “informed, skeptical, or comparative manner” (Morse, 2003, p. 891, Morse 2006) to maintain an inductive approach to questionnaire development.”