The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework of perception and action
By Bernhard Hommel, Jochen Müsseler, Gisa Aschersleben, Wolfgang Prinz. 2001
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4b8ccbc22a01cd21a103a0e935f2f25ea8b0199
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Martin H. Fischer
- Barbara Kaup
- E. Symes
- Jana Lüdtke
- Rolf A. Zwaan
- Rob Ellis
- Mike Tucker
- Lawrence W. Barsalou
Citations in the corpus
- Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances (2005, background): “Instead it may be that a common code (Hommel et al., 2001), or a particular visuomotor primitive common to many different actions (Tucker & Ellis, 2001), coded, in an abstract fashion, for orientation and lateralized responses.”
- A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. (2008, unknown): “This does not mean that an embodied cognition hypothesis would not face its own challenges about specifying the nature of the interface between perceptual and motor systems (Hommel et al., 2001).”
- Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? (2006, methodology): “Research on motor control (e.g., Hommel et al., 2001) indicates that the goal state of an action is represented and used as guidance in action planning.”
- Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension (2008, methodology): “Depending on one’s interpretation, the common coding view, as represented in TEC, either offers an even more reductive role for cognition (because all goal-directed planning eventually dissolves into the common feature representations for perception and action), or else successfully abandons the con”