HurryDate: Mate preferences in action

By Robert Kurzban, Jason A. Weeden. 2005

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b45e04c8c8b2748835d35791da2028db7cafdda8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Back
2. Jens B. Asendorpf
3. L. Penke
4. P. Borkenau
5. C. Nathan DeWall
6. Dan Ariely
7. Ali Hortaçsu
8. Günter J. Hitsch

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Back
2. Jens B. Asendorpf
3. L. Penke
4. Eli J. Finkel
5. P. Borkenau
6. Paul W. Eastwick
7. Dan Ariely
8. Ali Hortaçsu

In Marketing

1. M. Back
2. L. Penke
3. Jens B. Asendorpf
4. C. Nathan DeWall
5. Dan Ariely
6. Ali Hortaçsu
7. Günter J. Hitsch
8. Eli J. Finkel

Citations in the corpus

• Adult attachment and romantic partner preference: A review (2009, background): “For example, studies investigating gender in a dating context have found the differences identified in men’s and women’s hypothetical partner preferences to disappear in real-life dating scenarios (Eastwick & Finkel, 2008; Kurzban & Weeden, 2005).”
• Components of self-perceived mate value. (2008, background): “Mate value ought to reflect mate preferences, especially since mating mimics market theory (see Kurzban & Weeden, 2005 for a review).”
• Adaptive attentional attunement: evidence for mating-related perceptual bias (2007, background): “What stimulus characteristics would be likely to capture attention in this way? One characteristic that has received significant attention in the mating literature is physical attractiveness (e.g., Kurzban & Weeden, 2005; Shackelford, 2001).”
• From Dating to Mating and Relating: Predictors of Initial and Long–Term Outcomes of Speed–Dating in a Community Sample (2011, background): “Although women state such preferences in questionnaires, the evidence from dating studies involving real interactions is mixed, including speed-dating studies (Eastwick & Finkel, 2008; Kurzban & Weeden, 2005).”
• Matching and Sorting in Online Dating (2010, positive): “Our work is also related to a recent series of papers utilizing data from “speed-dating” events by Robert Kurzban and Jason Weeden ( 2005 ) , Raymond Fisman et al. ( 2006, 2008 , and Paul W. Eastwick and Eli J. Finkel ( 2008 ) .”
• Why Mate Choices are not as Reciprocal as we Assume: The Role of Personality, Flirting and Physical Attractiveness (2011, background): “…the individual reciprocity of mate choices Given the reciprocal nature of flirting behaviour it seems puzzling that mate choices are only mildly reciprocal on the dyadic level and even zero or negative on the individual level (Eastwick et al., 2007; Kurzban & Weeden, 2005; Luo & Zhang, 2009).”
• Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer. (2007, background): “For example, investigators have examined the role that variables such as physical attractiveness, height, age, body shape, and race play in the number of ‘‘yesses’’ individuals receive (Kurzban & Weeden, 2005).”
• Speed-Dating (2008, background): “…values than by idiosyncratic or similarity-based mating tendencies and (b) more by observable characteristics such as attractiveness, height, and age than by less observable Volume 17—Number 3 195 characteristics such as education, religion, or the desire to have children (Kurzban & Weeden, 2005).”
• Cross-Cultural Variation in Mate Preferences for Averageness, Symmetry, Body Size, and Masculinity (2013, background): “…to men of shorter or average stature (Swami et al., 2008) and prefer men to be taller than their female partner (higher sexual dimorphism in stature; Fink, Neave, Brewer, & Pawlowski, 2007; Kurzban & Weeden, 2005; Pawlowski, 2003; Pawlowski & Koziel, 2002; Pierce, 1996; Shepperd & Strathman, 1989).”