Models of object recognition
By Maximilian Riesenhuber, Tomaso A. Poggio. Nature Neuroscience, 2000
735 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b44a278ceccabc60548f2959d43a1f258d38f55d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Tomaso A. Poggio
- James J. DiCarlo
- E. T. Rolls
- Laurent Itti
- Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
- Daniel L. K. Yamins
- Joel Z. Leibo
- Gustavo Deco
Citations in the corpus
- A neurodynamical cortical model of visual attention and invariant object recognition. (2004, methodology): “Recently, Rolls, Aggelopoulos, and Zheng (2004) (see also Rolls & Deco, 2002) investigated how information is passed from the inferior temporal cortex (IT) to other brain regions to enable stimuli presented in complex natural scenes to be selected for action.”
- How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? (2005, background): “Following such a view, objects would be processed almost systematically before the scene (Biederman, 1987; Riesenhuber & Poggio, 2000).”
- Unsupervised Learning of Invariant Representations in Hierarchical Architectures (2013, background): “This is the insight underlying many networks for visual recognition, including HMAX [32] and convolutional neural nets [33, 34].”
- Realistic Modeling of Simple and Complex Cell Tuning in the HMAX Model, and Implications for Invariant Object Recognition in Cortex (2004, methodology): “The mechanisms rely on a non-linear MAX operation (or its soft-MAX approximation, [14]) over properly chosen afferents, i.”
- Why Does Deep and Cheap Learning Work So Well? (2016, background): “In neuroscience parlance, the functions fi compress the data into forms with ever more invariance [28], containing features invariant under irrelevant transformations (for example background substitution, scaling and translation).”
- Modeling the influence of task on attention. (2005, background): “2000)), and other factors (for reviews, see Arman & Aggarwal, 1993; Riesenhuber & Poggio, 2000 ).”
- A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. (2005, background): “…proposing a computational account of position and size invariance in visual recognition (for different approaches, see Heinke & Humphreys, 2003; Riesenhuber & Poggio, 2000; see also Fukushima, 1980; Larsen & Bundesen, 1978, 1998), we assume (a) that the effective RF can vary in position…”
- Finding a roadmap to achieve large neuromorphic hardware systems (2013, background): “…input representations are important for neural computation, and some have done some interesting engineering work based on these front-end systems (Riesenhuber and Poggio, 2000; Fu et al., 2008; Schaik et al., 2009; Chakrabartty and Liu, 2010; Liu and Delbruck, 2010; Farabet et al., 2011;…”
- Do early sensory cortices integrate cross-modal information? (2007, background): “Such intra-modal combinations often result in responses that reach about the average response of both features presented in isolation (Riesenhuber and Poggio 2000).”
- Unsupervised learning of invariant representations (2016, background): “This is the insight underlying many networks for visual recognition, including HMAX [2] and convolutional neural nets [3] [4].”
- A Theory of Object Recognition: Computations and Circuits in the Feedforward Path of the Ventral Stream in Primate Visual Cortex (2005, methodology): “Computationally, there is no difference between categorization and identification (see [Riesenhuber and Poggio, 2000]).”
- Trade-Off between Object Selectivity and Tolerance in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex (2007, methodology): “This model uses layers of neural units in a feedforward hierarchy, tuned to produce a gradual buildup of selectivity (AND-like operations) and tolerance (OR-like operations) (Fukushima, 1980; Perrett and Oram, 1993; Wallis and Rolls, 1997; Riesenhuber and Poggio, 1999, 2000).”
- Object Detection (2020, background): “A typical example is the MAX operation [11,1].”
- The role of single neurons in information processing (2000, methodology): “The MAX operation discussed in this issue by Riesenhuber and Poggi”