Knowledge, consumption, and endogenous growth

By Richard N. Langlois. 2001

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b447d595979cf115d39a11003e8b6b20a19c3ae4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The dark side of knowledge transfer: Exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects (2015, background): “By contrast, tacit knowledge cannot be articulated and must be acquired through trial-and-error (Langlois, 2001).”
Variety in the Knowledge Base of Knowledge Intensive Business Services (2010, background): “Ultimately, the mutual influence between the tasks established by production plans and the capabilities that are needed to accomplish them confers to knowledge its emergent structure (Langlois, 2001; Metcalfe, 2002).”
Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement (2010, unknown): “However, economies of scale may be limited by greater demand for variety which is perceived as greater quality, for which customers may be willing to pay a premium price (Langlois, 2001 ).”
Innovation and the evolution of industries (2006, background): “However, producers and consumers should not be treated as completely symmetrical because of their different stress on standardization and variety ( Langlois 2001; Devetag 1999; Aversi et al. 1999).”
MAKING SENSE OF INSTITUTIONS AS A FACTOR SHAPING ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE (2001, background): “As the example suggests, the productive operation of any particular routine generally is keyed to and made effective by the embodiment of the operation of other routines in materials and equipment (see Langlois, 1999 for an elaboration on the theme that routines often are embodied in machines).”
What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature (2006, methodology): “The assumption of disembodied knowledge has also been used in early endogenous growth theory (A rrow , 1962 ; R omer , 1986 ), and it still appears to be a core assumption of the neoclassical new growth theory that disembodied knowledge as an essentially non-rival good has a quantitatively importa”