The 2nd wave of knowledge management: The management control of knowledge resources through intellectual capital information

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Who and What Really Counts? Stakeholder Prioritization and Accounting for Social Value (2015, unknown): “Its success is dependent upon managers possessing adequate expertise and resources (Ahrens and Chapman, 2004; Henri, 2006; Mouritsen and Larsen, 2005; Wouters and Wilderom, 2008).”
Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review (2013, methodology): “…SECI conversion model (see Figure 4), formulated by Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) based on this dichotomy, proposes that valuable TK resides within individuals and can add value only if converted to EK through one of four conversion modes (Diakoulakis et al., 2004; Mouritsen and Larsen, 2005).”
Intellectual capital measurement: a critical approach (2009, background): “The concept of intellectual capital (IC) is based on the wide recognition that organisational knowledge needs to be managed ( Mouritsen and Larsen, 2005”
Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: A backward look and a proposal for going forward (2011, background): “…overlaps extensively with intellectual capital, has become a widely studied field focusing on the management of knowledge assets (Davenport & Prusak, 1997; Mouritsen & Larsen, 2005; Newell, Robertson, Scarbrough, & Swan, 2002; Newell, Robertson, Scarbrough, & Swan, 2009; Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).”