Antarctic marine benthic biodiversity in a world-wide latitudinal context

By J. Gray. Polar Biology, 2001

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3bb6a6b5058280b53d6e6149fca1f668cac4d99

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. G. Woodward
2. A. Clarke
3. Peter Convey
4. C. Broyer
5. Huw Griffiths
6. J. Gili
7. N. Friberg
8. G. Yvon‐Durocher

In Oceanography

1. A. Clarke
2. Huw Griffiths
3. C. Broyer
4. D. Piepenburg
5. J. Gili
6. J. Gutt
7. J. Crame
8. H. Hillebrand

Citations in the corpus

• On the Generality of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient (2004, background): “Several authors postulated differences in diversity patterns between Southern and Northern Hemispheres because of different biome areas, different land : ocean size ratios, different geological age, and different oceanography (Gaston and Williams 1996; Wilson 1998; Gray 2001).”
• Evolution and diversity of the benthic fauna of the Southern Ocean continental shelf (2004, background): “It is apparent that in almost all instances investigated to date significantly higher richness has been observed in the Antarctic than Arctic regions, and hemispheric asymmetry may be a persistent feature of global marine diversity (Gray 2001).”
• Admiralty Bay Benthos Diversity—A census of a complex polar ecosystem (2011, background): “The Southern Ocean benthic communities have rarely been analyzed in terms of habitat structural heterogeneity and complexity (Gray, 2001).”
• The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity (2014, background): “In contrast, the Southern Ocean shows far less intense gradients in marine diversity (Gray 2001).”
• Antarctic marine benthic diversity: patterns and processes (2008, background): “Since this topic has been reviewed in detail by a number of authors (Arntz et al., 1997; Gray, 2001; Clarke and Johnston, 2003), here I will concentrate on important recent developments in key areas.”
• Multiple lineages and absence of panmixia in the “circumpolar” crinoid Promachocrinus kerguelensis from the Atlantic sector of Antarctica (2007, background): “Although there has been considerable work on the biology of Antarctic marine fauna and estimates of Antarctic biodiversity in general (e.g. Arntz et al. 1997; Arntz and Rios 1999; Gray 2001; Gutt et al. 2004), few studies have focused on understanding”
• Seasonality, the latitudinal gradient of diversity, and Eocene insects (2010, background): “…of differential diversity patterns in southern oceans (Poore and Wilson 1993; Rex et al. 1993; Brey et al. 1994; Clarke and Crame 1997; Crame 2000; Gray 2001, but see Chown et al. 2004; Hillebrand 2004; Brandt et al. 2007; Waller 2008), marine diversity patterns often appear complex, at times…”
• Ecological Networks in a Changing Climate (2010, background): “The biogeographical isolation of Antarctica provides a close-to-pristine environment for studying intact ecosystems (Arntz et al., 1994; Chown and Gaston, 2000; Clarke, 1983; Dayton, 1990; Gray, 2001; Hedgpeth, 1971) and the recently characterized food web of the eastern Weddell Sea shelf and slope ”
• How many macrozoobenthic species might inhabit the Antarctic shelf? (2004, background): “In addition to this applied aspect, biodiversity studies can provide valuable information about latitudinal gradients (for review see Clarke & Crame 1997, Gray 2001) and evolutionary processes if comparable quantitative data are available.”
• Recent research on Arctic benthos: common notions need to be revised (2005, methodology): “In case of inventory diversity, four different levels are commonly used (Gray 2001): ‘point’ (diversity related to a single sample), ‘alpha’ (total diversity of several samples within a habitat, i.e., at a local scale), ‘gamma’ (total diversity of a larger area, e.g., an island or a landscape,…”