The First Release COSMOS Optical and Near-IR Data and Catalog
By P. Capak, H. Aussel, M. Ajiki, H. McCracken, B. Mobasher, N. Scoville, P. Shopbell, Yoshiaki Taniguchi, D. Thompson, S. Tribiano and 48 more. 2007
459 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present imaging data and photometry for the COSMOS survey in 15 photometric bands between 0.3 and 2.4 μm. These include data taken on the Subaru 8.3 m telescope, the KPNO and CTIO 4 m telescopes, and the CFHT 3.6 m telescope. Special techniques are used to ensure that the relative photometric calibration is better than 1% across the field of view. The absolute photometric accuracy from standard-star measurements is found to be 6%. The absolute calibration is corrected using galaxy spectra, providing colors accurate to 2% or better. Stellar and galaxy colors and counts agree well with the expected values. Finally, as the first step in the scientific analysis of these data we construct panchromatic number counts which confirm that both the geometry of the universe and the galaxy population are evolving.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b39b28709ea617c78736061b8cdad2fedcf1492a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Instrumentation
Citations in the corpus
- THE COSMOS-WIRCam NEAR-INFRARED IMAGING SURVEY. I. BzK-SELECTED PASSIVE AND STAR-FORMING GALAXY CANDIDATES AT z ≳ 1.4 (2009, methodology): “Astrometric and photometric solutions In the next processing step the TERAPIX software tool Scamp (Bertin 2006) was used to compute a global astrometric solution using the COSMOS i* catalogue Capak et al. (2007) as an astrometric reference.”
- Identification of the brightest Lyα emitters at z = 6.6 : Implications for the evolution of the luminosity function in the reionization era (2015, methodology): “To 1 Capak et al. (2007); http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/COSMOS/ 2 http://www.cfht.hawaii.edu/Science/CFHTLS/ c© 2015 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–20 convert the narrow-band excess to the observed EW, we first transform magnitudes (mi) to flux densities in each filter (fi) with the standard AB…”
- COSMOS2020: A Panchromatic View of the Universe to z ∼ 10 from Two Complementary Catalogs (2021, background): “Over the years, several COSMOS photometric catalogs have been publicly released (Capak et al. 2007; Ilbert et al. 2009; Ilbert et al. 2013; Muzzin et al. 2013; Laigle et al. 2016).”
- Great Optically Luminous Dropout Research Using Subaru HSC (GOLDRUSH). I. UV Luminosity Functions at $z \sim 4-7$ Derived with the Half-Million Dropouts on the 100 deg$^2$ Sky (2017, unknown): “…obtained in the SXDS (Ouchi et al. 2008; Ouchi et al. 2010) and COSMOS fields (Murayama et al. 2007; Shioya et al. 2009), and high- z dropout galaxy candidates selected from the deep broadband images in these two fields (Furusawa et al. 2008; Capak et al. 2007) were also observed as mask fillers.”
- GOODS-HERSCHEL: STAR FORMATION, DUST ATTENUATION, AND THE FIR–RADIO CORRELATION ON THE MAIN SEQUENCE OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES UP TO z ≃ 4 (2014, methodology): “Following a common procedure for producing accurate photometric redshifts (see, e.g., Capak et al. 2007; Gabasch et al. 2008), we allowed for a photometric offset in each measured band.”
- The VLA-COSMOS 3 GHz Large Project: Continuum data and source catalog release (2017, background): “, and the deep multiwavelength X-ray to mm photometry (Scoville et al. 2007; Koekemoer et al. 2007; Hasinger et al. 2007; Capak et al. 2007; Sanders et al. 2007; Bertoldi et al. 2007; Elvis et al. 2009; Ilbert et al. 2013; McCracken et al. 2012; Scott et al. 2008; Aretxaga et al. 2011; Smolčić et…”
- PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT AND CLASSIFICATION FOR THE XMM–COSMOS SOURCES (2008, methodology): “Simulations (Capak et al. 2007) show that the flux in 3.”
- Evidence for a Population of High-Redshift Submillimeter Galaxies from Interferometric Imaging (2007, background): “…to a depth of 27.1 magnitudes (Koekemoer et al. 2007), a variety of ground–based optical and near–infrared imaging data (see Taniguchi et al. 2006; Capak et al. 2007), IRAC and MIPS imaging at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, and 24 µm to 5σ depths of ∼0.9, 1.7, 11.3, 14.6, and 71 µJy respectively (Sanders…”
- The DEIMOS 10K Spectroscopic Survey Catalog of the COSMOS Field (2018, background): “A “C” in front of the number refers to the i-band-selected catalog of Capak et al. (2007) and Ilbert et al. (2009).18 If an object is not present in either of these catalogs, it does not have an identifier.”
- THE COSMOS2015 CATALOG: EXPLORING THE 1 < z < 6 UNIVERSE WITH HALF A MILLION GALAXIES (2016, methodology): “Astrometric accuracy We compared the astrometric positions of bright, nonsaturated objects in COSMOS2015 with those in the COSMOS reference catalog from Leauthaud et al. (2007) and the publicly available i+-selected photometric catalog (footnote 4) described in Capak et al. (2007).”
- THE CHANDRA COSMOS LEGACY SURVEY: OPTICAL/IR IDENTIFICATIONS (2015, methodology): “We adopted the same optical positional uncertainties of C12, i.e., 0.2′′ for the K band (McCracken et al. 2010), 0.3′′ for the i band (Capak et al. 2007) and 0.5′′ for the 3.6 µm band (Sanders et al. 2007).”
- Erratum: Recovering galaxy stellar population properties from broad-band spectral energy distribution fitting (2012, methodology): “In the fitting we adopt errorbars typical of those of the COSMOS survey (Capak et al. 2007) for mock galaxies at redshifts 6 1 (∼ 0.3 mag for near-IR bands and ∼ 0.05 mag otherwise) and those of GOODS star-forming objects (Giavalisco et al. 2004) for mock galaxies at redshift > 2 (∼ 0.1 mag).”
- THE SFR–M* RELATION AND EMPIRICAL STAR FORMATION HISTORIES FROM ZFOURGE AT 0.5 < z < 4 (2015, unknown): “For COSMOS spectroscopic redshifts come from Lilly et al. (2009) and Trump et al. (2009).”
- The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses (2015, methodology): “The Subaru r+ imaging has good image quality (FWHM ∼ 0.8 arcsec) and reaches a 5σ depth of ∼ 26.5 AB.”
- COSMOS: Hubble Space Telescope Observations (2006, methodology): “The ground-based imaging (Capak et al. 2007) currently includes 18 filters including narrow- and intermediate-bandwidth filters.”
- Deep Spitzer 24 μm COSMOS Imaging. I. The Evolution of Luminous Dusty Galaxies—Confronting the Models (2009, background): “…very high density of optical sources in our data (e.g., ∼ 45 galaxies arcmin−2 for i+AB < 25mag in the Subaru COSMOS observations, Taniguchi et al. 2007; Capak et al. 2007) could lead to lots of wrong associations if these identifications had to rely on a direct match between the 24µm and optical…”
- Evolution in the properties of Lyman-α emitters from redshifts z ~ 3 to z ~ 2 (2008, methodology): “For the photometry of the candidates, we use the public data-set from the COSMOS survey (Capak et al. 2007).”
- COSMOS PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS WITH 30-BANDS FOR 2-deg2 (2008, methodology): “Compared to the previous optical/near -infrared catalogue (Capak et al. 2007) the new photometry implements 14 new medium/narrow band data from the Subaru Telescope, deep groundbased NIR data (J and K bands) and SpitzerIRAC data.”
- zCOSMOS – 10k-bright spectroscopic sample - The bimodality in the galaxy stellar mass function: exploring its evolution with redshift (2009, methodology): “…of the field with multiband photometry from the UV (with GALEX, Zamojski et al. 2007), optical (with Subaru and CFHT, Taniguchi et al. 2007, Capak et al. 2007), NIR (with CTIO, KPNO, Capak et al. 2007, and CFHT, McCracken et al. 2010), to MIR and FIR (S-COSMOS with Spitzer, Sanders et al.…”