COSMOS PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS WITH 30-BANDS FOR 2-deg2

By O. Ilbert, P. Capak, Mara Salvato, H. Aussel, H. McCracken, D. Sanders, N. Scoville, J. Kartaltepe, Stéphane Arnouts, É. Le Floc'h and 54 more. 2008

929 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present accurate photometric redshifts (photo-z) in the 2-deg2 COSMOS field. The redshifts are computed with 30 broad, intermediate, and narrowbands covering the UV (Galaxy Evolution Explorer), visible near-IR (NIR; Subaru, Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope (CFHT), United Kingdom Infrared Telescope, and National Optical Astronomy Observatory), and mid-IR (Spitzer/IRAC). A χ2 template-fitting method (Le Phare) was used and calibrated with large spectroscopic samples from the Very Large Telescope Visible Multi-Object Spectrograph and the Keck Deep Extragalactic Imaging Multi-Object Spectrograph. We develop and implement a new method which accounts for the contributions from emission lines ([O ii], Hβ, Hα, and Lyα) to the spectral energy distributions (SEDs). The treatment of emission lines improves the photo-z accuracy by a factor of 2.5. Comparison of the derived photo-z with 4148 spectroscopic redshifts (i.e., Δz = zs − zp) indicates a dispersion of at i+AB < 22.5, a factor of 2–6 times more accurate than earlier photo-z in the COSMOS, CFHT Legacy Survey, and the Classifying Object by Medium-Band Observations-17 survey fields. At fainter magnitudes i+AB < 24 and z < 1.25, the accuracy is . The deep NIR and Infrared Array Camera coverage enables the photo-z to be extended to z ∼ 2, albeit with a lower accuracy ( at i+AB ∼ 24). The redshift distribution of large magnitude-selected samples is derived and the median redshift is found to range from zm = 0.66 at 22 < i+AB < 22.5 to zm = 1.06 at 24.5 < i+AB < 25. At i+AB < 26.0, the multiwavelength COSMOS catalog includes approximately 607,617 objects. The COSMOS-30 photo-z enables the full exploitation of this survey for studies of galaxy and large-scale structure evolution at high redshift.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72ab5fed46edc601a76dd17634119b04ee7b44ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. C. Conroy
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. P. V. van Dokkum
  6. R. Somerville
  7. Volker Springel
  8. D. M. Alexander

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. C. Conroy
  4. P. V. van Dokkum
  5. M. Franx
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. Christopher J. Conselice
  8. R. Somerville

Citations in the corpus