Drawbacks to palaeodistribution modelling: the case of South American seasonally dry forests

By R. Collevatti, L. C. Terribile, G. Oliveira, Matheus S. Lima-Ribeiro, João Carlos Nabout, Thiago Fernando Rangel, J. Diniz-Filho. 2013

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/263ac0372f4b59b88611522101c152846d877bde

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. G. Colli
2. R. M. D. Ledo
3. F. Werneck

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Colli
2. R. M. D. Ledo

In Paleontology

1. G. Colli
2. R. M. D. Ledo

Citations in the corpus

• Modeling Species and Community Responses to Past, Present, and Future Episodes of Climatic and Ecological Change (2015, unknown): “…climates as well as the need for (d ) use of pooled niches to better approximate a species potential niche, (e) independent model validation, ( f ) use of multiple ENM algorithms to reduce the effect of model variation, and ( g) use of multiple climatic reconstructions (Collevatti et al. 2013).”
• The historical connections between the Amazon and the Atlantic Forest revisited (2017, methodology): “Second, they made no use of molec- ular studies or fossil/palaeopalynological records, which could be employed for ENM validation and hypothesis testing (Collevatti et al., 2013; Svenning, Fløjgaard, Marske, N ogues-Bravo & Normand, 2011; Werneck et al., 2011).”