Changing Governance of the World's Forests

By Arun Agrawal, A. Chhatre, R. Hardin. Science, 2008

823 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26383a6c87a81629bd61a70c1d371f6e9b31bb6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Trust, legitimacy and power in forest certification: A case study of the FSC in British Columbia (2012, background): “Once governments in these countries gained independence, they frequently declared public ownership over forest resources leaving the land claims of indigenous and local communities unresolved (e.g. Agrawal et al., 2008).”
Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions:Comparison of three programs from Cambodia? (2010, neutral): “In many countries land ownership and resource tenure are unclear, with land and resources technically still owned and managed by the state (Agrawal et al., 2008); natural resources have high rents thereby attracting resource grabs and corruption; powerful individuals can often act with impunity; and”
Impact of China's Large-Scale Ecological Restoration Program on the Environment and Society in Arid and Semiarid Areas of China: Achievements, Problems, Synthesis, and Applications (2011, background): “Broadly speaking, the goal of environmental conservation has historically not been met when it conflicts with land use changes driven by the demand for food, fuel, and profit ( Agrawal et al, 2008 ).”
Patronage or Participation? Community‐based Natural Resource Management Reform in Sub‐Saharan Africa (2008, background): “the neo-liberal orthodoxy of market-based incentives, property rights, and decentralization; donor interests in achieving synergies between rural development and biodiversity conservation; and the intersection between local demands for greater control over resources and political decision makers’ in”
Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, neutral): “…Hejnowicz), david.raffaelli@york.ac.uk (D.G. Raffaelli), murray.rudd@york.ac.uk (M.A. Rudd), piran.white@york.ac.uk (P.C.L. White). and rural livelihood development goals (Ferraro and Kiss, 2002; van Noordwijk et al., 2007; Agrawal et al., 2008; Pokorny et al., 2012; Muradian and Rival, 2012).”