National Innovative Capacity
By Michael E. Porter, Scott Stern. 2001
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b334b58a35aec2b52253c6de9de1d1218e564004
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Roy Thurik
- André van Stel
- S. Wennekers
- David B. Audretsch
- N. Bosma
- Zoltan J. Acs
- David Urbano
- Salvatore Greco
Citations in the corpus
- Driving Forces of Technological Change: The Relation between Population Growth and Technological Innovation-Analysis of the Optimal Interaction Across Countries (2014, background): “[49]), which have a higher average number of patents in comparison to nations with either higher or lower average population growth (see Table 4).”
- Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems (2004, methodology): “In some cases, comparative studies on the system-level have been utilized as a preliminary step to generate rankings of national innovation systems (see e.g. Porter and Stern (2002)).”
- On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness (2018, methodology): “For instance, in the National Innovative Capacity Index (Porter and Stern 2001), the dependent variable used in the regression analysis is the log of patents.”
- Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development (2005, methodology): “A preliminary analysis carried out by Reynolds et al. (2002), comparing so-called TEA rates for 29 countries in 2001 and 2002 however suggests the existence of a strong cyclical component of entrepreneurship (new business start-up rates) in the short run.”