Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input-output analysis. Part 2: Simulation

By B. Thomas, Inês Lima Azevedo. 2013

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3237aadcc1c26ccdc81173ceecde3804cc0adb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Carsharing’s Life-Cycle Impacts on Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (2016, background): “Experts estimate these effects to be as little as 5 to 15% 356 (Thomas and Azevedo 2013, Druckman et al. 2011) to as much as 35 to 40% (Sorrell 2007).”
Assessing the Effectiveness of Energy Efficiency Measures in the Residential Sector Gas Consumption Through Dynamic Treatment Effects: Evidence from England and Wales (2022, background): “…2018; Figus et al., 2017; Wei and Liu, 2017; Kulmer and Seebauer, 2019), microeconomic demand systems (Tovar and Wolfing, 2018), scenario analysis (Chitnis et al., 2014; Chitnis et al., 2013; Druckman et al., 2011) and input-output models (Thomas and Azevedo, 2013; Freire-Gonzalez et al., 2017).”
Household carbon emission research: An analytical review of measurement, influencing factors and mitigation prospects (2015, unknown): “…Chitnis et al’s (2013) estimates of the rebound effects of 7 energy efficient measures in UK households range from 5% to 15% and mostly derive from indirect effects; while Thomas and Azevedo (2013) also estimate an indirect rebound of 5-15% in primary energy and CO 2 emissions for U.S. households.”
Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups (2014, background): “The exceptions areMurray (2013) who investigates rebound effects from both efficiency and sufficiency measures for different income groups in Australia, and Thomas and Azevedo (2013) who do the same for the US.”
The Microeconomic Theory of the Rebound Effect and Its Welfare Implications (2015, result): “…immediately emerge from our framework: εs1;η11 = εf11;η11 þ 1 = –εf11;p1 = –εs1;π1 = –εs1;p1 : ð5Þ All of these follow directly from expressions (2), (3), and (4) and are proven elsewhere (Sorrell and Dimitropoulos 2008; Gillingham 2011; Thomas and Azevedo 2013a), so we do not prove them here.”
Consumer End-Use Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effects (2014, methodology): “(21), Thomas & Azevedo (23), and Thomas (43),3 shows the different components and mechanisms for household direct and indirect rebound effects in terms of energy services and actual energy quantities, before and after an investment in energy-efficient equipment.”