The Microeconomic Theory of the Rebound Effect and Its Welfare Implications
By Nathan W. Chan, Kenneth T. Gillingham. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2015
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5251b5591f6400dbe809a7bc32aad1c69f11a336
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
- Mona Chitnis
- Jordi Roca
- S. Sorrell
- D. Rapson
- Emilio Padilla
- Kenneth T. Gillingham
- Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh
- Gernot Wagner
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- S. Sorrell
- Mona Chitnis
- Kenneth T. Gillingham
- D. Rapson
- S. Carattini
- Gernot Wagner
- Jordi Roca
- Richard B. Howarth
Citations in the corpus
- Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations (2017, background): “Carbon pricing will further ensure that consumers automatically, without even realizing, make a trade-off between the individual benefits of new or higher energy consumption due to rebound and related climate change damages.(24) Indeed, carbon pricing will mainly discourage rebound associated with a”
- Living up to expectations: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households (2015, background): “A further bias may arise when energy commodities provide multiple energy services (Chan and Gillingham, 2014).”
- The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy (2016, background): “However, in settings with multiple energy services using the same fuel, this equality does not hold (Chan et al. 2014).”